The bound state solution for the Morse potential with a localized mass profile
Miraboutalebi S†,
Department of Physics, Islamic Azad University, Tehran North Branch, Tehran 1651153311, Iran

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: smirabotalebi@gmail.com

Abstract
Abstract

We investigate an analytical solution for the Schrödinger equation with a position-dependent mass distribution, with the Morse potential via Laplace transformations. We considered a mass function localized around the equilibrium position. The mass distribution depends on the energy spectrum of the state and the intrinsic parameters of the Morse potential. An exact bound state solution is obtained in the presence of this mass distribution.

PACS: 03.65.–w
1. Introduction

The investigations of the analytical solutions of the Schrödinger equation with position-dependent mass is one of the important topics in quantum mechanical sciences. The concept of the local mass has interesting features in the large scale characteristics of the universe and in gravitational field theories.[14] The position-dependent mass distribution also has received a great deal of attention in more terrestrial sciences, such as the material science, condensed matter physics, and semiconductors nanosubstructures,[57] quantum wells and quantum dots,[810] quantum liquids,[11] impurities in crystals,[12] and 3He clusters.[13,14]

The Hermitian Hamiltonian of von Roos with local mass distribution m = m(r) is given by,[5]

where P denotes the momentum operator and V(r) is an arbitrary potential. Also, α, β, and γ are the ambiguity parameters satisfying the dimensional constrain α +β +γ = −1. Several sets of the values of ambiguity parameters are suggested in the literature.[1519] Here, we apply the ambiguity parameter set suggested by BenDaniel and Duke (α = γ,β = −1).[15] This model ensures the continuities required at the heterojunction boundaries between two crystals.

Amongst the distinct methods that have been applied to solve the Schrödinger equation, one may mention the point-canonical transformation method,[2023] the factorization scheme,[24,25] the supersymmetry approach,[2628] the algebraic way,[29] the power series expansion,[30,31] the transfer matrix method,[32,33] the asymptotic iteration method,[3436] and the Nikiforov–Uvarov approach.[3740]

One of the most effective methods for solving the Schrödinger equation with different sorts of spherically symmetric potentials is the Laplace transformation method.[41] The advantage of this method is that a second-order differential equation reduces to a first-order differential equation. It was Schrödinger who used this technique for the first time in quantum physics in order to solve the radial eigenfunction of a hydrogen atom.[42] The method has become commonly employed ever since to solve various kinds of spherically symmetric potentials.[4350]

One of the significant potentials is the Morse potential which is applied for describing the vibrational and rotational movements of the diatomic molecules.[51] Solutions of the Schrödinger equation with the Morse potential are investigated by applying different methods in Refs. [52]–[61].

Here we introduce an analytical bound state solution of the Schrödinger equation with position-dependent mass. We apply the Laplace transformation method to obtain the eigenvalues and the eigenfunctions in a closed form. The point-canonical transformation method also has been applied[56,62] in order to get rid of the first derivative of the wave function. In this way, we can suitably separate the terms contained in the mass function from the terms of the field derivatives. Then, by applying some simple constraints, on the terms included in the mass function, we construct the mass function in such a way that the corresponding equation can be solved via the Laplace transformation method used in Refs. [3] and [46]. The obtained mass distribution is a physical one, that is positive-valued, convergent, and well localized around the equilibrium position of a typical molecule. The mass function depends on the ordinary parameters of the Morse potential. The obtained mass function also depends on the energy spectrum of the Morse oscillator.

The organization of this paper is as follows. In Section 2, we firstly introduce the initial form of the mass function with undetermined parameters. Then by considering the desired form of the Schrödinger equation which is most solvable with the Laplace transforms, we setup some constraints on our mass parameters to find the final form of the mass distribution. The parameters of the Morse potential become untouched. Then, in Section 3 we solve the equation and introduce a possible bound state solution of the model. Finally, some results and discussions are presented in Section 4.

2. A possible mass distribuion

For the BenDaniel–Duke Hamiltonian, the one-dimensional Schrödinger equation, in position representation, is given bycolumnbreak

The first derivative can be eliminated from the right-hand side of Eq. (2) by using the transformation:

This technique is based on the point-canonical transformation method.[56,62] Substituting Eq. (3) into Eq. (2), one obtains

In the case of the Morse potential,[51] equation (4) turns into the following equation

Here

and r0 is the equilibrium position of the molecules and the prime sign denotes differentiation with respect to x. The parameter D describes the depth of the potential and the dimensionless parameter α characterizes the potential acting range. Applying

where m0 is a mass dimensional parameter, equation (5) turns into

where

Here, we use the following effective mass distribution

where τ, γ, and η are constant parameters. Inserting Eq. (10) into Eq. (8) yields

with this providing that the constants D1, D2, and D3 must be

Also, the mass parameters in Eq. (10) must be of the following form

Substituting the above equations into Eq. (10) leads to

The mass function (14) is positive and convergent for y < yc. However, y has an upper limit ymax = k eα which can be found for xmin = −1 in Eq. (7). Therefore, this condition is well satisfied for ymax < yc.

3. Bound state solutions

In the presence of the mass function (14) our Schrödinger equation turns into Eq. (11). In order to have finite solutions at large values of y, we should apply the following ansatz

then equation (11) becomes

Here we use the Laplace transformation method to solve Eq. (16),[3,46] By applying Laplace transform[41]

the following equation can be obtained

where and from Eq. (12) D3 < 0. Equation (17) is a first-order differential equation and its solutions are in the form

where N′ is a constant. Here the term

is a multi-valued function. In order to have a single valued wave function we impose the condition

Now inserting Eqs. (7), (9), and (12) into Eq. (19), the eigenvalues of the bound states can be obtained as

In order to find the eigenfunctions, we should apply inverse Laplace transforms to Eq. (18). However, in order to do so, it needs to be expanded in power series. This leads to

After applying the inverse Laplace transform, we find

The series expansion of the confluent hypergeometric functions is given as

Comparing Eq. (22) with Eq. (23) yields

Inserting Eq. (24) into Eq. (15) and then Eq. (3) and using Eq. (14), leads to

where

and equations (9) and (20) have also been used. Here Nn is the normalization factor.

4. Discussions

This study has introduced a possible mass distribution for the Morse potential, which has an analytical bound state solution via the Laplace transformation method. We have found a closed form for the eigenvalue and eigenfunction of the corresponding one dimensional Schrödinger equation. The prominent point of this study is the considered mass distribution which depends on the quantum number n. In fact, using Eqs. (12) and (26), the mass distribution Eq. (14) yields

This mass function is convergent and positive for

However, the upper bound of y is given by

Therefore, by considering Eq. (26), our mass function is meaningful under the condition

or

This relation establishes a condition for the starting point of the quantum number n. The case n ≥ 0 works only for α < 0.693. In the case of H2 and HCl molecules with α = 1.440 and α = 2.380 respectively, conditions (28a) and (28b) require n ≥ 1. However for I2, with α = 4.954, we must have n ≥ 2. In order to have a schematic representation of the considered mass function, the distribution m/m0 is plotted in Fig. 1 for some typical molecules.

Fig. 1. Mass distribution m(r)/m0 for H22 molecules versus position r/r0 and quantum number n.

According to Fig. 1, the mass function is well concentrated around r = r0.

Figure (2a) shows the energy spectra for three molecules H2 (D = 38292 cm,−1), HCl (D = 37244 cm−1), and I2 (D = 12550 cm−1). Figure(2b) presents the solutions of the eigenfunctions for H2 molecules (k = 34.9) and for different quantum numbers n.

Fig. 2. The eigenvalues [Fig. (2a)] for three different kinds of molecules, and the eigenfunctions [Fig. (2b)] for H2.
Reference
1Kuijken KGilmore G 1989 Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 239 571
2Coles PJones B 1991 Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 248 1
3Miraboutalebi SSalehi H 2006 Gen. Rel. Grav. 38 269
4Miraboutalebi SJalalzadeh SMovahed M SSepangi H R 2008 Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 385 986
5von Roos O 1983 Phys. Rev. 27 7547
6von Roos OMavromatis H 1985 Phys. Rev. 31 2294
7Weisbuch CVinter B1997Quantum Semiconductor HeterostructureNew YorkAcademic Press
8Harison P2000Quantum Wells, Wires and DotsNew YorkWiley
9Rajashabala SNavaneethakrishnan K 2006 Mod. Phys. Lett. 20 1529
10Peter A J 2009 Int. J. Mod. Phys. 23 5109
11Arias de Saavedra FBoronat JPolls AFabrocini A 1994 Phys. Rev. 50 4248
12Geller M RKohn W 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 3103
13Barranco MPi MGatica S MHernández E SNavarro J 1997 Phys. Rev. 56 8997
14De Saavedra F ABoronat JPolls AFabrocini A 1994 Phys. Rev. 50 4248
15Ben Daniel D JDuke C B 1966 Phys. Rev. 152 683
16Li T LKuhn K J 1993 Phys. Rev. 47 12760
17Gora TWilliams F 1969 Phys. Rev. 177 1179
18Zhu Q GKroemer H 1983 Phys. Rev. 27 3519
19Vubangsi MTchoffo MFai L C2014Cent. Eur. J. Phys 1 [arXiv:1408.2104. 2014]
20Alhaidari A D 2002 Phys. Rev. 66 042116
21Yu JDong S H 2004 Phys. Lett. 325 194
22Chen G 2005 Chin. Phys. 14 460
23Chen GChen Z D 2004 Phys. Lett. 331 312
24Flügge S1974Practical Quantum MechanicsBerlinSpringer
25Dong S H2007Factorization Method in Quantum MechanicsBerlinSpringer
26Plastino A RRigo ACasas MGarcias FPlastino A 1999 Phys. Rev. 60 4318
27Chen GChen Z DLou Z M 2004 Phys. Lett. 331 374
28Chen GChen Z DXuan P C 2006 Phys. Lett. 352 317
29Koç RamazanKoca Mehmet 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 8105
30Yu JDong S HSun G H 2004 Phys. Lett. 322 290
31Kumar RChand F 2012 Phys. Scr. 85 055008
32Abdelmonem M SNasser IBahlouli HAl Khawaja UAlhaidari A D 2009 Phys. Lett. 373 2408
33Nasser IAbdelmonem M SBahlouli HAlhaidari A D 2007 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 40 4245
34Ciftci HHall R LSaad N 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 1147
35Bayrak OBoztosun I 2006 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 6955
36Kumar RChand F 2013 Commun. Theor. Phys. 59 528
37Tezcan CSever R 2009 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 48 337
38Ikhdair S MSever R 2008 Int. J. Mod. Phys. 19 221
39Maksimenko N VKuchin S M 2011 Russ. Phys. 54 57
40Meyur SMaji SDebnath S2014Adv. High Energ. Phys.ID952597
41Kreyszing E1979Advanced Engineering MathematicsNew YorkJohn Wiley and Sons
42Schrödinger E 1926 Ann. Phys. 384 361
43Englefield M J 1968 J. Austral. Math. Soc. 8 557
44Englefield M J 1974 J. Math. Anal. Appl. 48 270
45Swainson R ADrake G W F 1991 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 24 79
46Chen G 2004 Phys. Lett. 326 55
47Chen G 2005 Chin. Phys. 14 1075
48Arda ASever R 2012 J. Math. Chem. 50 971
49Miraboutalebi SRajaei L 2014 J. Math. Chem. 52 1119
50Das T 2015 J. Math. Chem. 53 618
51Morse P M 1929 Phys. Rev. 34 57
52Chen G 2004 Phys. Lett. 329 22
53de Souza Dutra AChen G 2006 Phys. Lett. 349 297
54Chen G 2005 Phys. Lett. 339 300
55Plastino A RRigo ACasas MGarcias FPlastino A 1999 Phys. Rev. 60 4318
56Bagchi BGorain P SQuesne C 2006 Mod. Phys. Lett. 21 2703
57Rajbongshi HSingh N N 2015 Theor. Math. Phys. 183 715
58Ikhdair S M 2012 Mol. Phys. 110 1415
59Arda ASever R 2011 Commun. Theor. Phys. 56 51
60Ovando GMorales JLópez-Bonilla J L 2013 J. Mol. Model. 19 2007
61Moya-Cessa H MSoto-Eguibar FChristodoulides D N 2014 J. Math. Phys. 55 082103
62Alhaidari A D2003Int. J. Theor. Phys.422999